Active officials

Officials with evaluation-review opportunity

Certified role credentials

Hosted sessions

Capability requiring attention

Immediate development queue

Dependency measures describe historical concentration in the loaded grids; they are not regulatory staffing standards.

About this view / column definitions

Active officials: distinct officials whose Active field is TRUE.

Officials with evaluation-review opportunity: distinct officials with at least one role credential classified as evaluation-review candidate/high priority.

Certified role credentials: number of certified official-role credential records, not number of people.

Hosted sessions: number of configured SCAR hosted sessions in the planning season.

Capability requiring attention: descriptive prioritization based on historical concentration plus available development pipeline. It is not a regulatory minimum or composite risk score.

Immediate development queue: officials nearest to an actionable evaluation review, ordered by readiness, evaluations remaining, historical experience and stable ID.

Season Development Decision View

A concise COC / Board view: current resource, realistic modeled gain, residual exposure, and priorities.

1. What resource do we control?

2. What can this season realistically accomplish?

Scenario envelope

Three fixed scenarios show how sensitive the result is to evaluation approval and success assumptions. This avoids treating the planning case as a forecast.

Priorities that persist across scenarios

3. What remains exposed after the three meets?

4. Recommended development priorities

Interpretation

This is decision support, not a staffing guarantee. Certification gains are scenario outcomes based on the two assumptions above. Historical concentration remains historical evidence until future meet participation is actually observed.

Download decision brief CSV

Data & Documentation

This tab defines the application's input contracts and analytical methods. Governing-body evidence, source-data facts, SCAR planning rules and analytical methods are intentionally distinguished.

Evidence hierarchy

  1. REMS / certification evidence: authoritative for recorded clinics, evaluations and certifications.
  2. Historical officials grids: evidence that an assignment/experience occurred; not proof of a successful evaluation.
  3. Availability: a planning constraint for future sessions.
  4. SCAR configuration: local planning assumptions such as routine Finals treatment.

CSV input contracts

Cross-application calculation dictionary

Interpretive rules

  • Grid assignment = experience evidence; it does not prove evaluation.
  • Evaluation-review status identifies a candidate for COC/Competition Coordinator review; it does not authorize an evaluation.
  • A planned evaluation is not a successful evaluation.
  • Synthetic bundled data are a software test fixture and are not findings about SCAR.
  • Level IV, Level V, Referee and Competition Coordinator status are not automatically awarded by this application.

Historical Grid / REMS Reconciliation

This is an evidence-control view. Historical grid assignments prove deck experience; REMS/certification records remain authoritative for evaluations and certification.

Exception counts

Download reconciliation register Download cleanup queue

Prioritized cleanup queue

P1 = source-record integrity issue; P2 = development/evaluation follow-up; P3 = lower-risk planning follow-up.

Exceptions requiring review

Full reconciliation register

Flag definitions
  • TRAINED_NO_EXPERIENCE : clinic/training recorded but no loaded historical deck assignment.
  • EXPERIENCE_NO_SIGNOFF : deck experience exists, training is complete, but no successful evaluation is recorded.
  • ONE_EVAL_WITH_EXPERIENCE : one successful evaluation plus deck experience exists for a credential requiring at least two.
  • CERTIFIED_INACTIVE_ROLE : certification is recorded but the loaded historical grids contain no assignment in that role.
  • GRID_REMS_MISMATCH : historical assignment exists for an official-role without a matching credential record.
  • REMS_CERTIFICATION_EVIDENCE_GAP : certification is marked complete but the loaded evaluation count is below the modeled requirement.

Effective club depth

Validation

About this view / column definitions

Certified_Headcount: certified officials for the credential.

Role_Participating: certified officials observed at least once in that role in loaded historical grids.

Role_Reliable: certified officials observed at least twice in that role. This is a SCAR analytical indicator, not a governing-body definition.

Role_Participation_Rate: Role_Participating / Certified_Headcount.

Reliable_Depth_Rate: Role_Reliable / Certified_Headcount.

Absence from loaded historical grids does not prove that an official is inactive.

Development readiness

Level I–III pathway state

Individual pathway status

Role credential/readiness state

Level IV/V are excluded from automatic completion logic.

About this view / calculation method

Foundation_Complete: explicit REMS registration + Intro clinic + Safety Marshal clinic evidence.

L1_Complete: foundation complete plus Timekeeper certification in this operational reconstruction.

L2_Complete: Level I gate + IT + JS + at least one optional Level II credential.

L3_Role_Requirement_Complete: Level II plus four optional Level II credentials total. Full Level III completion also requires all clinics and Para e-learning.

CR/CJE Joint Credential: both clinics, at least one Chief Recorder evaluation, and at least two total CR/CJE evaluations.

Reported_Level is retained for comparison but is not substituted for missing pathway evidence.

21-session season map

Hosted-session development resource

Planning rules

Finals treatment below is a SCAR planning assumption, not a Swim Ontario prohibition.

About this view / planning assumptions

Sessions: configured hosted sessions for the meet.

Standard_Sessions / Finals: counts derived from configured Session_Type.

Planned_Evaluation_Sessions: STANDARD sessions under the current SCAR planning rule.

Finals remain experience-eligible. Routine evaluations are not planned in Finals by default. This is a SCAR operating assumption, not a Swim Ontario prohibition.

Depth versus dependency

Historical role dependency

Effective certified depth

Top-1/Top-3 shares describe workload concentration. Effective depth shows how much certified capacity actually appears in loaded SCAR grids.

About this view / calculation method

Top1_Share: assignments by the most-used official / all historical assignments for that role.

Top3_Share: assignments by the three most-used officials / all historical assignments for that role.

HHI: sum of squared individual assignment shares.

Equivalent_Active_Officials: 1 / HHI; the equally-utilized-official equivalent of the observed concentration.

These are workload-concentration measures. They are not certification requirements or staffing minimums.

Senior officiating capacity

Level III+ planning gaps

Planning indicators only; no Level IV/V, Referee or CC status is auto-awarded.

About this view / limitations

Senior Capability is a monitoring view. It uses reported level, historical Referee experience, clinic evidence and clinic-instruction indicators.

The application does not automatically award Level IV, Level V, Referee or Competition Coordinator status because those pathways include external review/approval and experience requirements beyond this model.

Role priority

Three-meet development plan

Evidence integrity gate

Unresolved P1 reconciliation issues are excluded from development allocation until source records are resolved. P2/P3 issues remain visible as review notes.
Download plan CSV

Plan summary

Download summary CSV

Allocation fairness

Eligible officials should receive a first opportunity before second assignments are distributed. Zero-allocation officials require review when capacity remains.

Eligible officials with no planned allocation

Candidate action queue

About this view / allocation method

Planned_Action: development experience or conditional evaluation-review assignment generated by the heuristic planner.

Deck_Role: actual source deck role used for the assignment; important for the CR/CJE joint credential.

Hard planning constraints include availability, one simultaneous assignment per person/session, configured role development capacity, training status and Finals evaluation rule.

The plan prioritizes actionable evaluation review and useful pipeline development. It does not assert that the Competition Coordinator has approved an evaluation.

Downloaded CSV is a planning artifact, not a completed officials grid.

Season feasibility

Individual pathway roadmap

Credential development state

Planned hosted-meet opportunities

About this view / calculation method

Availability_Profile: derived from session-level availability: Working Day + Weekend, Working Day Only, Weekend Only, or Unavailable.

Working Day: Friday sessions in the configured hosted-meet calendar. Weekend means Saturday/Sunday.

Season_Feasibility: descriptive planning classification based on remaining credential gaps, training status, available sessions and whether the current plan contains a feasible hosted-meet opportunity.

Individual pathway roadmap: uses a fixed role order and fixed milestone axis for every official. Each role also displays the intended number of volunteering assignments and the meet, day, session, and whether the assignment is development experience or an evaluation candidate.

Evaluation-review targets remain conditional on COC/Competition Coordinator judgment. Availability categories summarize the underlying session-level availability and do not replace it.

Baseline versus scenario

Meet-by-meet state transitions

Season-end capability impact

Scenario certification gains are modeled outcomes. Historical concentration metrics remain historical evidence and are not rewritten by the scenario.

Capability gaps remaining after three hosted meets

Certification change by role

Level advancement

Transition audit trail

Download transition ledger

Certification changes only after an assumed successful evaluation.

About this view / scenario method

Readiness approval rate: user-supplied scenario assumption for the share of evaluation candidates approved for evaluation.

Evaluation success rate: user-supplied scenario assumption applied after approval.

Certification change: occurs only after a scenario evaluation succeeds and the modeled credential rule is satisfied.

Scenario outputs are counterfactuals, not forecasts. The transition ledger is provided so every modeled change can be audited.